Constraint-based Decision-Makers in Negotiation Processes
نویسندگان
چکیده
Computer-supported negotiation processes are recurrent in many applications, typically to coordinate a set of autonomous decision-makers in order for them to reach a consensus on negotiated issues. In previous papers, we have presented Xplore, a generic model and tool for the design of such coordination, which subsumes a wide range of existing negotiation protocols and schemes. In this paper, we show how to build an interesting class of components capable of taking part in Xplore-coordinated negotiations. Decision-makers of that class are entirely automatic, and are capable of ensuring that arbitrary constraints, normally set by the coordinator of a negotiation, are respected throughout the negotiation process, whatever its evolution. We show how to derive such components by encapsulating arbitrary constraint solvers working by propagation on finite domains, a class of solvers which has been widely investigated in the literature and is nowadays available in many commercial products.
منابع مشابه
Attitude-Based Strategic Negotiation for Conflict Management in Construction Projects
■ An innovative negotiation methodology for managing conflicts in construction projects is presented in this article where multiple decision makers are involved. The proposed negotiation methodology has a unique ability to consider the attitudes of the decision makers, which is an important psychological factor in the negotiations that take place in various stages of a construction project. The...
متن کاملAnalysis of the constraint proposal method for two-party negotiations
In the constraint proposal method a mediator locates points at which the two decision makers have joint tangent hyperplanes. We give conditions under which these points are Pareto optimal and we prove that under these conditions the mediator’s problem has a solution, when the number of issues in the negotiation is two or any odd number greater than two. In practice, the mediator adjusts a hyper...
متن کاملQualitative Decision under Uncertainty: Back to Expected Utility
Negotiation scenarios involving nonlinear utility functions are specially challenging, because traditional negotiation mechanisms cannot be applied. Even mechanisms designed and proven useful for nonlinear utility spaces may fail if the utility space is highly nonlinear. For example, although both contract sampling and constraint sampling have been successfully used in auction based negotiation...
متن کاملA Co-Evolutionary Approach to Strategy Design for Decision Makers in Complex Negotiation Situations
The literature on automated techniques suggests that such techniques might be useful for complex decision making where other approaches have proven limited. We present a genetic technique that assists decision makers develop strategies for decision making in complex, multi-objective and multi-person negotiation situations. Strategies are evolved with significant input from decision makers to en...
متن کاملThe Macbeth Approach for Evaluation Offers in Ill–structure Negotiations Problems2
This paper described the main idea of the MACBETH approach and M-MACBETH software to multicriteria negotiation analysis. The MACBETH is based on the additive value model and requires only qualitative judgments about differences of attractiveness to help a decision maker quantify the relative value of options or criteria. The main goal of this procedure is to support interactive learning about e...
متن کامل